Pearson Edexcel A Level History Paper 2c 2025 Mark Scheme

Get the official Pearson Edexcel A-Level History Paper 2 Option 2C mark scheme from the June 2025 examination series (9HI0/2C) covering France in Revolution, 1774–99, and Russia in Revolution, 1894–1924. This examiner-approved PDF contains the complete AO1 and AO2 assessment criteria, source-analysis guidance, indicative content, level descriptors, and precise examiner expectations used to award marks in the live Summer 2025 examination.

This mark scheme explains the exact analytical standards required for top-band responses on the September Massacres, the French Directory, the Lena Goldfields dispute, the Revolutions of 1905 and February 1917, and the survival of the Bolshevik regime. It includes detailed indicative content on Louis XVI’s failings, revolutionary violence in Paris, worker treatment at the Lena mines, Lenin’s political leadership, Brest-Litovsk, the NEP and the weaknesses of anti-Bolshevik opposition. Pair it with the matching Edexcel 9HI0/2C June 2025 question paper on markscheme.net for complete examiner-standard revision and self-assessment practice. Updated for the 2025/2026 academic year, optimised for mobile and desktop, and instantly downloadable from markscheme.net — your fastest route to top-grade A-Level History revision.

This document is designed for Year 12 and Year 13 students preparing for the 2026 Pearson Edexcel A-Level History examinations, including retake candidates targeting A and A* grades, sixth-form learners, and home-educated students studying revolutionary France and revolutionary Russia. It is especially valuable for students aiming to understand how examiners reward source evaluation, contextual analysis, balanced judgement and analytical depth in depth-study essays.

It is equally useful for teachers, private tutors, revision-course providers and parents supporting advanced History revision at home. The mark scheme can be used to standardise essay marking, run examiner-style feedback sessions, assess AO2 source-analysis skills, moderate high-level responses, and identify weaknesses in revolutionary politics, social unrest and ideological conflict historical argumentation.